点击右上角
微信好友
朋友圈
请使用浏览器分享功能进行分享
中国烹饪协会：春节餐饮市场回暖 实现“开门红”******
中新网1月28日电(中新财经记者 宋宇晟)记者获悉，中国烹饪协会开展的“兔年春节期间重点餐饮企业经营情况调研”数据显示，除夕至正月初六(1月21日—27日)受访餐饮企业营业收入与去年春节相比上涨24.7%，与2019年春节相比上涨1.9%；客流量与去年春节相比上涨26%，与2019年春节基本持平。
中国烹饪协会供图中国烹饪协会指出，今年春节餐饮堂食等各类线下消费场景加快恢复，线上单品消费保持一定旺盛势头，实现了餐饮的“开门红”。
北京市商务局重点监测的百货、超市、专业专卖店、餐饮和电商等企业实现销售额50.9亿元，恢复至去年农历日同期的98%，较2019年增长13.2%。除夕当日，全聚德、隆福寺餐饮、又一顺餐厅营业额同比分别增长90.8%、66.2%、63.9%。
河北省37家重点监测餐饮企业营业额2766.9万元，同比增长6.53%；江苏省餐饮业零售总额达130.3亿元，同比增长9%；湖南省餐饮企业春节假期累计实现销售25.18亿元，较去年同期增长13.8%；陕西省重点监测餐饮样本企业的餐饮收入9532万元，同比增长43.8%。
西安市春节期间餐饮收入较去年同期翻倍，较2019年同期增长超过20%，创历史新高。成都市20个餐饮品牌30个门店年三十至正月初四实现销售收入670.6万元，同比增长45%-120%，人流量同比增长超过2.1倍。武汉市大部分餐厅上座率达到85%，部分餐厅达到120%。
春节深圳餐饮市场火爆，传统酒楼从年夜饭至年初六基本都客满，潮江春大中华喜来登店、五稻厨房国创店等当地著名潮粤菜年夜饭已恢复到2019年同期水平；春节假期的点都德、蔡澜点心店的午市茶市翻台率1-2轮。深圳市政府持续出台餐饮扶持大礼包政策，助力餐饮市场回暖，分期发放1亿元春节消费券，刺激拉动消费。
在青岛市，商超内餐饮企业如大渔铁板烧，渔荷、开海等上座率与已恢复到往年同期水平，多家老字号上座率基本在90%以上。在南京，新街口、夫子庙、老门东商圈各大餐饮店客流量同比增长超四成。在扬州，各大商圈综合体年味足人气旺。武汉商圈也同样火热，范湖天街和万象城内餐饮业中晚餐上座率已达到150%，武商MALL米其林添好运华中首店，打卡者络绎不绝，巴奴、凑凑火锅营业至凌晨3时。
资料图 徐明睿 摄此外，中国烹饪协会调研数据显示，26.7%的餐饮企业的预制菜销售同比去年上涨。北京市老字号全聚德、便宜坊、旺顺阁、烤肉宛、曲园酒楼上新多款年夜饭套餐及年货礼盒，护国寺小吃起源店非遗小吃礼盒单日销售超1000盒；武汉餐饮业大胆创新的手提年饭礼盒，今年销售量达到了50万盒；山东本土餐饮巨头山东凯瑞商业集团精心准备了多种预制菜品，消费者可以通过食瑞鲜凯瑞商城小程序下单，该集团预制菜销售同比去年上涨50%。
美团外卖数据显示，今年春节期间，北京、西安、广州、重庆、上海成为春节外卖销量前五位，其中热门旅游城市西安的春节菜品销量同比去年增长了62.84%，重庆增长了219.78%。其中，正餐订单增速同比去年增长14.1%，火锅订单量同比去年增速14.6%，小吃快餐订单同比去年增速7.6%，烧烤订单量同比去年增速2.9%，饮品同比去年订单增速31.1%，面包甜点的订单量增速同比去年增长10.5%。
数据还显示，异地消费较去年同期增长76%。其中，北京、三亚、成都、重庆、大理等地成为异地消费者堂食订单量最多的前5座城市。
值得注意的是，在餐饮消费火爆的同时，餐饮企业员工人手短缺的问题逐渐凸显。根据中国烹饪协会的调研，本次受访餐饮企业中50%的餐饮企业表示在兔年春节期间，员工人手紧张，36%的餐饮企业表示员工人手极度短缺。中国烹饪协会分析，餐饮业消费快速恢复之后，春节期间的整体预定量暴增，客流量大，是导致员工人手不足的原因，传统餐饮业除了依靠短期加薪等方式来激励员工，聘用小时工等方式缓解用工荒，同时需转型升级，加快发展现代化餐饮服务业。(完)
搜索
复制
中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事****** 中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。  资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。 日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。 日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。 事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。 因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。 日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。 《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。 德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。 日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。 国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。 太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。  Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business By John Lee (ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year. Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business. The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster. On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year. The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public. In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run. Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public. The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution. The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community. The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses. According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan. As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment. However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact. Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad. The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies. If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence. 
|
)